Though it has been hotly debated for last several months, I have kept away from writing
on the Office
Open XML (OOXML) proposed by Microsoft and currently a ECMA standard. With the
ISO voting due today I thought let me write my views before the results.
Basically what OOXML means is a standardized file format based in XML for Word, Excel
& PowerPoint documents. You have convertors to convert from OOXML to MS Office
native formats or to ODF (ISO standard supported by Open Office & Open source).
Accepting OOXML as an ISO standard increases the openness of your documents, there
by you can safely assume that your grandchildren can open and read the documents created
by you today long after the programs that created them are dead and not available.
OK agreed, this may not be important for your monthly budget spreadsheets but certainly
crucial for E-Governance applications that are used for exchange between different
governments and with various departments within them.
Recently India
has rejected (which I feel is sad) OOXML. Yesterday I heard the most convincing
reason on why OOXML should be accepted by ISO and surprisingly it was not from Microsoft
camp - it was from the Editor of the competing standard ODF 1.2. The argument
from Patrick Durusau in the article "Who
Loses if OpenXML Loses" where he has made several points on how ODF itself will
loses if OOXML is rejected. Key arguments to note are on Spreadsheet formulas support
and support for legacy MS documents.
You can track the status of voting from this
site.
Read the complete post at http://www.venkatarangan.com/blog/2008/03/29/OOXML+Debate.aspx